Queenslanders risk losing their say on major developments under proposed laws

Environmental Advocacy in Central Queensland (EnvA) has warned that proposed changes to Queensland’s development laws could leave communities with less say over major projects that affect their lives, properties and local environments.

EnvA lodged a submission opposing the State Development and Public Works (Critical Minerals) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2026, arguing that it would significantly reduce community consultation and weaken opportunities for Queenslanders to challenge government decisions.

EnvA Director Dr Coral Rowston said the Bill was being promoted as a way to support development, but would come at the cost of transparency, accountability and community participation.

“Queenslanders deserve a genuine say in decisions that affect their communities, their environment and their future,” Dr Rowston said.

“This Bill would make it easier for governments to fast-track projects while making it harder for local communities to understand, question or challenge those decisions.”

EnvA’s submission raises concerns that the Bill would allow Ministers to grant special status to projects behind closed doors, reduce consultation requirements and limit review and appeal rights that currently help ensure decisions are fair and accountable.

The organisation is also concerned about proposals that could expand powers to access private land and acquire land for projects declared to be strategically important.

“Whether you live in a regional town, on a rural property or in a growing urban community, these changes could affect your ability to have a voice in decisions that directly impact you,” Dr Rowston said.

“Good development decisions are made when communities are informed, consulted and heard. Public consultation and independent review are not red tape – they are essential safeguards that help protect both communities and the environment.”

EnvA argues that Queensland already has processes in place to assess and approve major projects and that the Government has not demonstrated why such sweeping new powers are necessary.

The organisation has called on the Parliamentary Committee to reject the Bill in its current form and ensure any future reforms retain meaningful community consultation, transparency and appeal rights.

“Development should not come at the expense of democratic rights,” Dr Rowston said.

“The people most affected by major projects deserve a seat at the table, not a reduced role in decisions that shape their future.”